Home
   Journal    Friends    Archive    User Info    Memories
 

Online Diaries: Transformation of Medium and Meaning - New possibilities: Communities and more!

Nov. 9th, 2006 04:06 am New possibilities: Communities and more!

Despite the added, negative aspects of potential lawsuits and threatening audiences of blogs, the ability to generate a large readership through the internet has given online diarists the chance to learn from one another and create communities. Like in the eighteenth and nineteenth century diaries, readers have the ability to post comments on blogs, so they provide a much more interactive, fruitful dialogue than private diaries. As Carolyn Burke says, “Suddenly I had an audience from the Internet. Nameless, faceless people - the Internet - spoke back to me. The Internet, a blur of people, became my therapist, my confidant, my intimate friend” (DHP). Unlike diaries of the past, online diaries allow bloggers to receive feedback from people they don’t know, who are perhaps from a different country or have completely different opinions from them. It is through this ability to connect with very dissimilar people that many bloggers and readers learn from one another. 1996 blogger Lunesse says, “I learned tons about others, of course. Lives I never will live myself, thoughts I wouldn't have come across on my own. I have learned how to better process and work through some things in my life as a result of reading how others went through similar things” (DHP). This access to the emotions, activities, and lives of others provides readers the opportunity to learn about and learn from many people unlike themselves.

Additionally, because online diaries are (or have the potential to be) very personal, many bloggers form strong connections and communities through reading about one another’s online lives. Some bloggers end up meeting each other; for instance, Jennifer Wade says, “I've met nearly thirty other diarists, and I count many of them among my closest friends” (DHP). Or bloggers, such as Jesse Chan-Norris, whom I quoted in the context of catering to audiences, form such strong connections that they marry.

Thanks to linking to other blogs and the connections bloggers form with each other, bloggers’ thoughts and ideas often grow from one another. As scholar Jill Walker says, “In closeknit communities, like LiveJournal, the narration of weblogs sometimes seems like a group autobiography” (Walker, 16). The communities formed through blogs are unusually strong. I think Steve Schalchlin puts it succinctly and well when he writes: “Our diaries illuminate. They change peoples' lives. They create community and family” (DHP).

Therefore, blogs, though still diaries at a basic level, are in many ways so much more than written diaries. They can have links to articles that pertain to what the writer is thinking about; they can link to friends’ blogs, so the reader can read about the same event in the eyes of a different person; and, as I’ve said before, they can create communities through these links and posted comments (Walker, 16).

Current Mood: rejuvenated

Leave a commentPrevious Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry

Comments:

From:[info]writingmachines
Date:December 7th, 2006 02:22 am (UTC)

Something else to think about...

(Link)
“So what have I learned in three and a half years of putting my life and my emotions online? Besides the value of community I have very definitely learned the value of actual, one on one, face to face communication. As powerful as the written word can be, online journals only provide the illusion of intimacy. That's not to say that friendships can not be forged through journals and emails. And that is not to say that a friendship formed online can be any stronger or weaker that one formed in physical contact. When you get down to it though, the portrait painted in the online journal is only as real as the paper that it's written on.”--Jesse Chan-Norris (http://www.diaryhistoryproject.com/recollections/1997_01_09.html)

I think this quote really pertains to my earlier post on how all writing, and especially writing for dairies, is performative, yet Chan-Norris’ words still puzzle me. Postliterate told our class that one of her friends said that she has learned much more about her through reading postliterate’s blog than through…well, actually “knowing” her face-to-face. So I guess in the end, blogging without face-to-face interaction can (in Himmer’s words) create a character that might be distant and completely unlike the real person, while reading the blog of someone you know might actually add to your overall concept of her of him and allow you more intimacy with the person.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:December 7th, 2006 03:49 am (UTC)
(Link)
Funny how these comment boxes don't let us identify ourselves... We're all "anonymous"...

Anyway, I just had two ideas-

The first is structural: you often refer back to other posts within your journal here--wouldn't it be cool if you linked between them? For instance, here you mention Jessie Chan-Norris and say that you've referenced here before. Why not link back to that reference? It's one of the critiques we had of GAM3R 7H30RY, and it's pretty easy to address in this format.

The other idea I'm sort of working through (and that I semi-articulated in class ) is how these journals function as a means of communication/correspondence. You claim that blogs enable world-wide communication--something totally different from the private diary, even if such a diary were performed for a local audience. I wonder whether, given this new level of performance, this potentially totally-unfamiliar audience--an unfamiliar audience that is engaged with immediately during the composition of every entry rather than abstractly, after the diary has been published--the blog and the diary are really quite as similar as you present them? The emphasis of the blog is more on communication between people--the audience is imminently present... someone can reply to a post within seconds of it's being published. A journal... well, that simultaneity of composition and feedback is way, way, way (often permanently) delayed.

Now, I know this is perhaps a whole different topic, but it's something I've been mulling over ever since you presented.

Anyway, awesome paper; it's really cool to read through! Great job!
From:[info]writingmachines
Date:December 11th, 2006 03:37 am (UTC)
(Link)
Hi "Anonymous"...ha, it is odd that LiveJournal won't let you say who you are unless you have an account.

First of all, thanks for both of your points. They are really interesting and important. I had actually previously thought about the first point you raised on linking to other passages, and I will go back and make some of those links. The reason I didn't initially (and this will probably come off as an after-the-fact excuse), but I wasn't sure how people would read my LiveJournal. I mean, linking makes sense if the reader clicks on each entry and reads it as its own page, but I assumed that readers would look at what I wrote on the main "writing machine" page, since you can read everything from that main page (and, as a result, the linking would be semi-pointless). Then again, this assumption of mine also means that I don't think people will read the comments I posted on my own entries, and I hope they do! In fact, near the end of the paper, I have some longer comments, and I debated whether or not I should make them their own entries. I just don't know how interested LiveJournal readers are in the comments. So...if anyone reading has an opinion on this, please post!

Your second point is also completely valid, and it made me reconsider how I presented my case for the similarities between print diaries and blogs. What I was trying to get across is that the basic, fundamental use or meaning of diaries--as a vehicle for expression--is not changed in the transformation of print to online. True, I did say that blogs allow for instant feedback and the formation of communities, but I don't see this as their main function (and perhaps that's where we differ in opinions). I see the new communities and communication as an added benefit of blogs, but not their main purpose; if something wanted to connect/communicate with someone else, they could simply post comments on others' personal blogs, but I think writing one's own blog means that the person wants to express herself in writing, and it requires her (still) to put herself in writing, just as she would in a print diary.

So, yes, I agree that the feedback on print journals is typically delayed (though it wasn't in the 18th century; it just had a smaller audience) and that blog feedback is instant. And, through this instant feedback, the blog has created new, additional benefits (and problems) to what a diary can do. But I hope that through looking at the history of diaires, and especially at the words of some of the first bloggers (who say they still want to use the blog as they would any diary; please see http://writingmachines.livejournal.com/2518.html) that diaries and blogs are still similar at a fundamental level.

I hope this made sense! Thanks again for your post; you really made me think, and I hope I was able to make the above points clear in my paper. Please let me know if I didn't!

 

Advertisement